Damon's Arrival: Cashman's Turnabout?
The centerfield hole brought an opportunity for the Yankees to get younger, cheaper, and more flexible at a position that demands athleticism. Instead, they spent $13 million on one 32-year-old centerfielder. But, I'm OK with the Damon signing. I would have much preferred that the Yankees spend that $13 million elsewhere, but Damon is a good pickup nonetheless. It's a bit odd seeing him in pinstripes, but I don't hate Damon, and I'll embrace him as our centerfielder like I embraced Wade Boggs and Roger Clemens before him. It's just that this seemed like a great opportunity to show the world that the Yankees were a team in the midst of a change. Spending $13 million on another All-Star means the Yankees are a team that refuses to change.
But... I'm OK with Damon for three reasons: (1) the Matsui Deal - identical in length and dollar amount to the Damon deal, with Matsui being only 7 months younger. If Matsui deserves $13m, Damon probably does as well (more important position, more speed, bats leadoff). (2) the New Lineup - maybe Jeter should still lead off, but either way this is one of the deadliest lineups assembled in some time - 1-6 is an absolute pitcher's nightmare, and 7-9 contains one of the best offensive catchers in baseball, the active Yankee hits leader, and the 2005 Rookie of the Year runner-up. (3) It hurts the Sox - even though they save on Damon's salary, his departure still creates a hole at another important position at a time when it will only get tougher for Boston to trade for help.
On the other hand, my biggest problem with the signing is that I was really beginning to like - no, love - the way the Yankees were being put together. Cashman seemed focused on bringing depth to the team instead of all-stars (see: Bullpen). If nothing else, a Yankee team with Bubba, Michaels, Patterson, or Reed in center and a deep bench would have been a very fun team to watch and follow. This team feels like all the others since The Dyanasty - stacked and one-dimensionally boring. A Yankee team that spends for depth rather than top-quality would leave the door wide open for the farm system to finally start helping out, instead of serving as trade-bait. Young players are always more fun to watch.
As a Yankee fan, I don't get the opportunity to follow young players that often, and I really thought this would be the year the Yankees start getting younger. That's what worries me most about this deal - it puts in my head the idea that the Yankees will never get younger - that their payroll means that they will just buy every 32 year old All-Star on the market before they give their own kids a chance; that the farm system exists just as a factory for trade chips; that the Robby Cano Story was a complete fluke and the only way the Yankees will ever infuse young talent is if they were forced by the hand of God (or the incredibly ineffective bat of Tony Womack).
I've put a great deal of trust in Brian Cashman - I've defended his every move because it's seemed like he's always acted with a grand "New Yankee Philosophy" in mind. A philosophy I am (was?) very excited about. Although he should still be commended for not selling the farm, what's the point of keeping the farm if you're just going to buy every superstar that's available? I'm not going to flip on Cash over one move, but if this Damon deal is just a sign of things to come, I might have to stop wearing my "Cashman #98" jersey t-shirt...



